Chiefs saved by one other controversial name to remain undefeated



This one didn’t assist calm the “Chiefs get all of the calls” narrative.

Kansas Metropolis used a controversial non-call Sunday evening to flee with a 22-17 street win over the Falcons, only one week after a late move interference arrange a game-winning discipline aim towards the Bengals.

The Chiefs (3-0) appeared to get away with a move interference on tight finish Kyle Pitts in the long run zone on a third-and-5 with lower than 5 minutes to go whereas nursing a five-point lead.

Falcons coach Raheem Morris appeared fairly tiffed with the referees’ inaction.

“I like my cash,” Morris stated. “I like my cash that Arthur Clean provides me. I’m very sensible sufficient to remember sufficient to speak about officers. They made the decision or they didn’t make the decision, it’s what it’s. We had an opportunity to win the soccer sport on the final play of the sport.”

Bryan Prepare dinner was not flagged for move interference on this play. AP

The back-to-back champion Chiefs are in that territory the place they’re believed to be benefactors of every name, with loads of notable flags or non-flags going their method in recent times.

The fourth-down defensive move interference in Week 2 allowed them to keep away from an upset and this non-call saved them from one other upset Sunday, though the Falcons had different probabilities to win.

With the Falcons on the Chiefs’ six-yard line with a bit greater than 4 minutes remaining, quarterback Kirk Cousins lofted a move to Pitts in the long run zone.

No penalty was known as on this third-and-5 play. USA TODAY Sports activities by way of Reuters Con

As Pitts got here again to the ball, Chiefs security Bryan Prepare dinner clearly received a hand round Pitts’ waist and made contact earlier than the ball arrived.

Pitts couldn’t corral the move, and the Falcons in the end turned the ball over on downs.

“That could be a real-time name that officers should make a judgment on,” referee Tra Blake stated in a pool report, in accordance with NFL Community. “From the angle that they’d on the time, they didn’t really feel there was a foul dedicated.”

He added: “We do the perfect we will to make that call.”

Had this been known as, the Falcons would have had the ball on the one-yard line. @MySportsUpdate/X

Cousins wished he might have a do-over whereas referencing how there probably might have been a flag.

“I didn’t have a very good viewpoint on it,” Cousins stated. “It was robust. … In hindsight, if I might have the play over once more, I both would have gotten to Kyle earlier or if had been to get to him as late as I did, put the ball up increased and to not even actually put it within the refs’ arms at that time.”

The Falcons (1-2) nonetheless had an opportunity to win the sport on their ensuing drive after they drove the ball to the Chiefs’ 13-yard line, however back-to-back runs for zero and minus-three yards ended that drive.

Followers took to X to share their displeasure with the decision, particularly because it benefitted the Chiefs.

One fan wrote: “Kyle Pitts will get bear hugged throughout this catch try and the refs nonetheless don’t name a penalty for Move Interference. I can’t make this clear sufficient, the Chiefs PAY the refs to WIN.”

One other commented: “Each primetime chiefs sport has a play like that move interference on pitts that they profit from. the primary sport of the 12 months, their defensive coordinator was allowed to name a timeout for some motive.”



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Comment